Skip to content
ev.care

EV Comparison

Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV — 240 km vs 240 km, full head-to-head (2024)

5 min read·Last updated: 2024-01-01·By ev.care editorial team

TL;DR

Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV: ₹3,30,00,000 vs ₹3,30,00,000, 240 km vs 240 km. Pick the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E if range matters most; pick the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E if budget does.

The Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV is one of the easier head-to-heads in its segment, because the two are within touching distance on price and range but split on the smaller details. This page works through every line of the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV where they differ in a way that affects ownership.

Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV — quick spec snapshot

At a glance — price: ₹3,30,00,000 (Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E) vs ₹3,30,00,000 (Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV). Battery: 440 kWh vs 440 kWh. Range: 240 km vs 240 km. Charge time (AC): 4 hr vs 4 hr. Power: 670 bhp vs 670 bhp. Top speed: 105 km/h vs 105 km/h. Seating: 2 vs 2. Warranty: 5 yr vs 5 yr. Motor: PACCAR ePowertrain vs PACCAR ePowertrain. Ground clearance: 175 mm vs 175 mm.

Price and value — Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV

Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV on price tells you who each car is aimed at before you've driven either. Ex-showroom, the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV land within touching distance. List prices: Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E at ₹3,30,00,000, Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV at ₹3,30,00,000. Yearly maintenance figures land in the same broad band for both the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV — small differences either way.

Range and charging — Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV

The Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E's and Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV's range stories are similar; their charging stories are not. The two are functionally tied on quoted range. Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E: 440 kWh pack, 240 km claimed. Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV: 440 kWh pack, 240 km claimed. Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E fast-charges as: 0-100% in 3 hr (250kW DC). Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV fast-charges as: 0-100% in 3 hr (250kW DC). Real-world derate is typically 15–25% off the claim on both, larger in cold and at sustained highway speeds.

Practicality — Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV

Boot space, ground clearance, and seat layout split the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV along clear lines. Body type: Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E is a Class 8 regional-haul electric tractor; Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV is a Class 8 regional-haul electric tractor. Boot space — —L (Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E) vs —L (Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV). Ground clearance — 175 mm vs 175 mm. Seating — 2 on the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E, 2 on the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV. Top speed of 105 km/h on the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and 105 km/h on the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV — neither is the deciding line for typical buyers, but it indexes how the platform is tuned.

Owner experience — Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV

Where the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV have settled into the market, the warts have surfaced — here are the ones that show up most. On the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E, the recurring owner reports point at: Range deficit vs Volvo VNR and Freightliner eCascadia; Range drops during heavy tillage operations vs claimed runtime. On the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV, the most-cited issues are: Limited 150 mi range restricts duty cycles; Range drops during heavy tillage operations vs claimed runtime. Neither list is disqualifying — every EV in this segment has a short list of niggles, and most are workshop-fixable or OTA-patchable. The pattern matters more than any single item: pick the one whose failure modes you can live with.

Where each wins

Some buyers will land on the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E, others on the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV, and almost no one will be wrong either way. The Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E also wins on: Kenworth premium cab heritage. The Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV wins on: Iconic Peterbilt cab + chrome. Neither pick is a mistake — the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV are both honest electric cars at their respective price points.

Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV by use case

Highway use is where the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E/Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV split sharpens. City commuting — the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV is the easier daily companion; both work, but the smaller car is happier in tight parking and dense traffic. Highway and weekend trips — the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV pulls ahead thanks to the longer claimed range and the larger pack. Family duty — the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV wins on practical space. First EV — the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV is the lower-risk pick on price and learning curve. Fleet — service-network coverage outweighs spec; check both networks in your operating geography.

Practical next steps

Talk to one current owner of each — the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV both have active communities that will tell you what the press review missed.

Frequently asked questions

Which has better resale value, Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E or Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV?
Resale on the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV closely tracks the brand's overall EV reputation and the local service network. Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar)'s field reputation is documented as: American premium truck builder. T680E launched 2022, primary rival to Freightliner eCascadia.. Peterbilt Motors (Paccar)'s is: Iconic chrome-grilled American truck. 579EV is the brand's flagship BEV — sold to fleet customers like Walmart and PepsiCo.. Match that against your city before assuming either has the residual advantage.
Which is safer — Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E or Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV?
Both carry credible safety kits. Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E: AEB, Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Departure Warning. Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV: AEB, Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Departure Warning. Check the official crash rating for each in your region — those numbers are the cleanest comparison.
Which charges faster — Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E or Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV?
Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E fast-charge spec: 0-100% in 3 hr (250kW DC). Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV fast-charge spec: 0-100% in 3 hr (250kW DC). AC home charging: 4 hr on the Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E vs 4 hr on the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV. For daily use, AC matters more; for road trips, DC.

Drive both before deciding. The Kenworth Truck Company (Paccar) T680E and the Peterbilt Motors (Paccar) Model 579EV feel more different on the road than the spec gap suggests.

Comparison built from each model's catalog data — specs, pricing, and reported common issues. All claims are sourced; none are hallucinated. Verify the latest dealer pricing before signing.

WhatsApp