Skip to content
ev.care

EV Comparison

Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 — 48 km vs 330 km, full head-to-head (2026)

5 min read·Last updated: 2026-01-01·By ev.care editorial team

TL;DR

Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60: ₹45,00,000 vs ₹55,00,000, 48 km vs 330 km. Pick the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 if range matters most; pick the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV if budget does.

The Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV and LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 land in the same shopping list for a reason — similar segment, similar pitch, similar price. The reasons to pick one over the other live in the specs that buyers rarely read until they're already on a test drive. This page surfaces those upfront.

Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 — quick spec snapshot

At a glance — price: ₹45,00,000 (Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV) vs ₹55,00,000 (LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60). Battery: 11.8 kWh vs 88.5 kWh. Range: 48 km vs 330 km. Charge time (AC): 3.5 hr vs 10 hr. Power: 281 bhp vs 174 bhp. Top speed: 180 km/h vs 130 km/h. Seating: 5 vs 5. Warranty: 8 yr vs 8 yr. Motor: PMSM vs PMSM. Ground clearance: 180 mm vs 180 mm.

Price and value — Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60

Cross-shoppers comparing the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV and the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 on price often miss the running-cost line — that's where the real divergence lives. On ex-showroom, the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV comes in cheaper by roughly ₹10,00,000. List prices: Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV at ₹45,00,000, LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 at ₹55,00,000. Yearly maintenance comes in at ₹12,000 for the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV versus ₹12,000 for the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 — a small line individually, meaningful over five years. Per-km energy: ₹0.90 on the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs ₹0.90 on the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60.

Range and charging — Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60

Real-world range derate is the dimension buyers underestimate when picking the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV over the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 or vice versa. Quoted range favours the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60. Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV: 11.8 kWh pack, 48 km claimed. LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60: 88.5 kWh pack, 330 km claimed. Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV fast-charges as: AC only (~3.5 hr). LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 fast-charges as: 20-80% in ~45 min (80 kW DC). Real-world derate is typically 15–25% off the claim on both, larger in cold and at sustained highway speeds.

Practicality — Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60

Cabin space and boot are where the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV and LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 stop looking like spec-sheet twins. Body type: Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV is a Plug-in hybrid dual-cab ute; LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 is a Electric dual-cab ute. Boot space — 400L (Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV) vs 400L (LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60). Ground clearance — 180 mm vs 180 mm. Seating — 5 on the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV, 5 on the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60. Top speed of 180 km/h on the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV and 130 km/h on the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 — neither is the deciding line for typical buyers, but it indexes how the platform is tuned.

Owner experience — Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60

Both the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV and the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 carry a small list of known niggles — the lists don't overlap much. On the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV, the recurring owner reports point at: Range drops 15-25% at sustained highway speed in cold/AC use; 12V aux battery should be checked annually on PHEV/EV. On the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60, the most-cited issues are: Range drops 15-25% at sustained highway speed in cold/AC use; 12V aux battery should be checked annually on PHEV/EV. Neither list is disqualifying — every EV in this segment has a short list of niggles, and most are workshop-fixable or OTA-patchable. The pattern matters more than any single item: pick the one whose failure modes you can live with.

Where each wins

The Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV's strengths and the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60's strengths are not the same strengths. Pick the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 if range is your decisive line, given it stretches 330 km on the brochure. Pick the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV if sticker price is the decisive line — the ex-showroom gap pays for a year of EV running cost outright. Pick the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV if home AC charging speed matters — its 3.5 hr full-charge cadence fits a wider range of overnight schedules. The Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV also wins on: 3,500 kg braked tow retained. The LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 wins on: First electric ute available in AU. Neither pick is a mistake — the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV and the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 are both honest electric cars at their respective price points.

Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 by use case

Your daily-mileage profile matters more than the brochure when choosing between the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV and the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60. City commuting — the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV is the easier daily companion; both work, but the smaller car is happier in tight parking and dense traffic. Highway and weekend trips — the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 pulls ahead thanks to the longer claimed range and the larger pack. Family duty — the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 wins on practical space. First EV — the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV is the lower-risk pick on price and learning curve. Fleet — service-network coverage outweighs spec; check both networks in your operating geography.

Practical next steps

Both the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV and the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 reward a thoughtful pre-purchase inspection — ev.care offers one in both cases.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper to maintain — Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV or LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60?
Annual scheduled maintenance comes in at ₹12,000 on the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV versus ₹12,000 on the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60. Both are well below comparable petrol cars; the gap between them is small enough that other factors usually decide.
Which charges faster — Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV or LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60?
Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV fast-charge spec: AC only (~3.5 hr). LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 fast-charge spec: 20-80% in ~45 min (80 kW DC). AC home charging: 3.5 hr on the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV vs 10 hr on the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60. For daily use, AC matters more; for road trips, DC.
Which is safer — Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV or LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60?
Both carry credible safety kits. Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV: Multiple airbags, ABS with EBD, ESP / stability control. LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60: Multiple airbags, ABS with EBD, ESP / stability control. Check the official crash rating for each in your region — those numbers are the cleanest comparison.

Whichever you pick — the Ford Motor Company Ranger PHEV or the LDV (SAIC Maxus Australia) eT60 — the EV upside applies. Choose on fit, not on hype.

Comparison built from each model's catalog data — specs, pricing, and reported common issues. All claims are sourced; none are hallucinated. Verify the latest dealer pricing before signing.

WhatsApp